Thursday, May 8, 2025

Tory Policy Creating Happiest Country?

 The happiest countries in the world—often topped by the Nordic nations like Finland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands—are known for their strong social safety nets, high levels of trust, and high standards of living. 


However, they also contain elements that align with certain conservative values, particularly those of traditional British conservatism (as distinct from radical libertarian or far-right variants).


Here are some policies in these countries that resonate with UK-style conservative values:



1. Fiscal Responsibility

Nordic model countries run relatively balanced budgets and have low public debt compared to GDP.

Despite high taxes, they often prioritize efficiency in government spending—something fiscal conservatives in the UK often champion.

2. Strong National Identity and Border Controls

Nordic countries generally maintain strict immigration policies, especially after the 2015 migrant crisis.

There is a strong emphasis on integration and civic participation, aligning with conservative concerns about national cohesion.


3. Law and Order

High levels of law enforcement professionalism and trust in police, with a focus on community stability.

Policies often balance social liberalism with a strong sense of civic duty and accountability—a mix that appeals to conservative values.


4. Support for the Family Unit

Generous parental leave and child benefits, but in a way that reinforces the importance of family structure, something social conservatives support.

Government support is designed to promote independence and work, not long-term dependency.

5. Decentralization and Local Governance

Power is often devolved to local councils in the Nordic model, in line with traditional UK conservative values around localism and subsidiarity.

6. Work Ethic and Personal Responsibility

Welfare systems are designed to encourage work participation, and there’s a cultural emphasis on self-reliance and contribution to society.

7. Education with Accountability

Education systems are largely public but emphasize quality, teacher autonomy, and national standards—blending left and right approaches.

There's an expectation that schools uphold civic values and social cohesion, not just diversity and inclusion rhetoric.

In essence, while these countries are known for their progressive policies, many of their institutional designs are deeply pragmatic, reflecting conservative priorities: fiscal prudence, stable communities, strong institutions, and personal responsibility.

Chatgpt 8/05/25

Monday, May 5, 2025

Krishnamurti on Psychiatry and Maslow

 Jiddu Krishnamurti had a critical and unconventional view of psychiatry, especially as it existed in his time. While he did not completely reject the existence of psychological suffering or the need for help, he believed that true understanding and transformation lie beyond the realm of traditional psychiatric methods. Here's a summary of what he might say about psychiatry:


1. Psychiatry treats symptoms, not the root: Krishnamurti often emphasized that psychological issues stem from deep confusion, fear, and conditioning. He would say that psychiatry often focuses on labeling and managing symptoms (through diagnosis and medication) rather than helping individuals understand the nature of thought, fear, and the self.


2. Freedom vs. conditioning: He might argue that psychiatry often reinforces societal norms and conditioning, attempting to make individuals "adjust" to a sick society, rather than question it. Krishnamurti viewed freedom from conditioning—not adaptation to norms—as the key to psychological health.


3. No authority in inner inquiry: Krishnamurti rejected all forms of psychological or spiritual authority. He would likely be skeptical of psychiatrists positioning themselves as experts on the mind, because he believed self-understanding could not be handed down by another—it must be discovered directly by the individual.


4. Observation without judgment: He taught the importance of observing the mind without trying to control, suppress, or analyze it in the traditional sense. This stands in contrast to many psychiatric and even psychotherapeutic approaches that involve interpreting and managing mental states.


5. Silence and awareness over techniques and treatment: Instead of therapeutic techniques or medication, he emphasized choiceless awareness—simply observing thoughts, emotions, and sensations without resistance—as a way to bring about inner transformation.


That said, he wasn't insensitive to suffering. He acknowledged mental distress and suffering as real, but believed deep transformation could only come through direct awareness and self-inquiry, not from external authorities.

Here is a relevant quote from Jiddu Krishnamurti that reflects his view on psychological suffering and the role of authority, including psychiatry:


> “To be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society is no measure of health.”

— often attributed to Krishnamurti (widely quoted, though the exact source is debated)


And a deeper passage from "The Urgency of Change" (1970):


> “Psychologists and analysts have their place, but they are not going to solve the immense problems of human sorrow, anxiety, and despair. What we need is not another system of thought, not another analysis, but to understand ourselves as we are, now—not according to some theory, but by observing, by being aware.”


In essence, Krishnamurti invites people to move beyond external systems and observe the self directly, without the filter of diagnosis or analysis.

Here’s a summary comparing Krishnamurti’s approach with modern trauma therapy/psychiatry:


Krishnamurti’s Approach


Self-Observation without Analysis:

He emphasized choiceless awareness—watching thoughts, emotions, and sensations without interpreting, analyzing, or judging them.


No Authority, No Diagnosis:

He believed any external authority (psychiatrists, therapists, or even spiritual teachers) could become a barrier to real understanding, as truth must come from direct perception, not second-hand knowledge.


Root Cause: Psychological Conditioning

Mental suffering stems from fear, thought, time, and self-centered thinking—all conditioned responses. Healing means going beyond the egoic self and thought structures.


Rejection of Systems and Methods:

He warned against following fixed systems (including psychological ones) because they trap the mind in patterns and comparison.


Modern Trauma Therapy & Psychiatry


Diagnosis-Based:

Psychiatry typically classifies mental suffering under medical models (e.g., PTSD, depression), using diagnosis as a starting point.


Treatment Focus:

Common interventions include medication (to alter brain chemistry) and structured psychotherapies like CBT, DBT, EMDR, or ACT—many of which use techniques and tools for regulation, reframing, or behavioral change.


Acknowledges Nervous System Dysregulation:

Modern trauma-informed therapy focuses on how trauma lives in the body, not just the mind. It encourages grounding, self-regulation, and building safety—often through relationship.


Emphasizes Relationship and Validation:

Therapists often provide a safe space where the person can process feelings, reframe thoughts, and rewire responses—something Krishnamurti would see as limited if not accompanied by deeper inner revolution.


Key Contrast


Krishnamurti: “Insight ends suffering.”


Psychiatry: “Treatment manages suffering.”


He might respect therapists who listen deeply and help others become aware of their own conditioning, but he would likely see most psychiatric practices as superficial or misdirected, unless they fostered direct inner observation without dependence.

Krishnamurti would likely criticize Maslow's hierarchy of needs because it places psychological and spiritual awakening at the top of a linear, need-based ladder—something fundamentally opposed to his view of human transformation. Here’s why:


1. It Reinforces Psychological Time


Maslow's model implies you must first meet basic needs (food, safety, love, esteem) before you can reach self-actualization.

Krishnamurti rejected this kind of sequencing:


> “Truth is a pathless land.”

He believed truth or freedom isn’t reached step-by-step—it is discovered now, not after fulfilling conditions.


2. It Strengthens the Self


Maslow’s model centers around the development of the individual self and its fulfillment. Krishnamurti saw the “self”—the egoic, thought-constructed identity—as the root of conflict, fear, and division.


To him, self-actualization of the ego isn't liberation—it’s just a more polished prison.


3. It Promotes Becoming Over Being


Maslow’s model is aspirational: you move toward becoming a better version of yourself.

Krishnamurti taught that "becoming" is violence—because it denies what you are and creates inner conflict through comparison and striving.


> “In becoming, there is always fear.”


4. It Pathologizes Direct Awakening


If someone experiences deep insight, awareness, or inner freedom while poor, sick, or unloved, Maslow's model would see it as unusual or unlikely.

Krishnamurti would say awakening can occur in any moment, in anyone, regardless of conditions—if there is deep attention and insight.


5. It Serves a Social Ideal


Maslow’s hierarchy can be used to justify making people “functional” for society—moving them up the ladder to become productive, adjusted, self-esteeming citizens.

Krishnamurti saw this as dangerous conformity, helping people fit into a sick world rather than question it.


In short:


Maslow: Become your best self.

Krishnamurti: See through the self completely.



Chatgpt 2025, prompts by liz



Thursday, May 1, 2025

The use of fear as a motivator



Fear Is Not a Strategy: It’s a Moral and Financial Failure

Chatgpt with my prompts


Let us be perfectly clear: using fear as a tool of control is not leadership—it is cowardice wearing a necktie. Whether in the boardroom, the newsroom, or Westminster, those who rely on fear reveal not only their bankruptcy of imagination but their moral and financial ineptitude.


In business, fear may deliver short-term compliance, but at a monstrous cost. It kills innovation. It suppresses risk-taking, the very engine of progress. A fearful employee does not speak up when they see inefficiency, corruption, or catastrophe. They cover their arse. They retreat. And this costs money—vast amounts of it. Gallup’s global studies show that disengaged, fearful employees cost the world billions in lost productivity. Fear chokes initiative. The terrified cannot build; they can only survive.


In the media, fear is peddled not as a mistake, but as a business model. Editors long ago realised that headlines about hope don’t sell papers. So instead, we get the daily drip-feed of doom: the economy is collapsing, benefits are destroying society, the young are lazy, the old are greedy. But fear doesn’t make us informed—it makes us inert. When people are bombarded with existential threats, they stop engaging and start numbing. And when citizens numb out, democracy dies. In the long run, a fearful public is a disengaged public—and that is a financial death knell for any media outlet dependent on trust, subscriptions, or relevance.


But nowhere is the failure more grotesque than in politics. Take the Labour Party’s recent flirtation with benefit cuts. A party built on the dignity of labour and the social contract now seems prepared to dangle the threat of poverty over the heads of the most vulnerable, as if desperation were an acceptable incentive. This isn’t just morally obscene—it’s economically stupid. Pushing already-struggling people into deeper insecurity increases NHS burden, crime rates, housing crises, and long-term unemployment. Fear doesn’t get people into work. It gets them into A&E.


And what’s the payoff? A few swing voters swayed by tabloid morality? A pat on the head from the CBI? It is short-sighted, self-defeating policy dressed in the ill-fitting rags of fiscal responsibility. Even the IMF—no bastion of socialist thought—admits that cutting welfare often costs more than it saves.


The morality of fear is bankrupt. The economics of fear are worse. And the politics of fear? They end in voter apathy, social breakdown, and betrayal. This is not “pragmatism.” This is a failure of courage, cloaked in strategy.



---


Further Reading & References:


Gallup, “State of the Global Workplace” Reports – on the cost of disengagement in business


IMF Working Papers on Welfare Reform – showing long-term economic harm of benefit cuts


Joseph Rowntree Foundation – reports on poverty, benefits, and economic consequences


Jones, Owen. The Establishment (2014) – especially on Labour’s drift toward fear-based centrism


Furedi, Frank. Politics of Fear: Beyond Left and Right


Monbiot, George – Essays on moral cowardice in politics: monbiot.com



May 1st 2025 liz lucy robillard & chatgpt



Sunday, April 27, 2025

Reasons To Reduce the NHS

 

Here's a list of 30 reasons the UK would benefit from a smaller NHS and more private-sector involvement (companies like Medichecks, Thriva, Babylon Health, Push Doctor, etc.), plus actionable ideas for local health bodies:


1–10: Improving Efficiency and Speed


1. Reduced waiting times — Private services are typically faster.

2. Less administrative bloat — A smaller NHS would mean less bureaucracy.

3. Quicker diagnostics — Companies like Medichecks can deliver blood test results in days.

4. More GP access — Online GP consultations (e.g., Babylon Health) avoid weeks-long NHS delays.

5. Targeted screenings — Low-cost health checks (e.g., Thriva) can catch issues early.

6. Focus on severe cases — NHS could concentrate resources on emergency and complex care only.

7. Avoid “one-size-fits-all” care — Private services allow personalization based on patient choice.

8. More innovation — Private firms compete and therefore develop better technology (apps, AI triage).

9. Reduced pressure on A&E — Minor cases handled privately keep emergency rooms free.

10. Increased accountability — Poor private services quickly lose business, unlike stagnant NHS departments.


11–20: Economic and Workforce Benefits


11. Cost transparency — Private companies offer clear pricing; NHS costs are opaque.

12. Job creation — New firms and clinics create healthcare jobs and diversify options.

13. Health tourism boost — The UK could become a destination for affordable private care.

14. Empowering patients — Patients control their health decisions instead of relying on rationing.

15. Public-private partnerships — NHS could buy services rather than run everything in-house.

16. Increased competition — Forces both NHS and private providers to improve standards.

17. Attract tech startups — More healthtech firms like Push Doctor could emerge.

18. Upskilling clinicians — Private firms often train staff in cutting-edge methods.

19. Flexible work for doctors — GPs and nurses could mix private and public work more freely.

20. Private sector absorbs demand surges — E.g., during flu season or pandemics.


21–30: Health Outcomes and Local Innovations

21. Better chronic disease monitoring — Ongoing subscription services could track diabetes, cholesterol, etc.

22. Mental health support — Online therapy (e.g., MyOnlineTherapy) scales better than NHS waiting lists.

23. Customized wellness plans — Tailored interventions instead of NHS’s generic advice.

24. Encourages preventive care — Cheap, easy access to checks motivates earlier action.

25. Decentralized care — Local firms know local needs better than distant NHS trusts.

26. More choice in treatments — Access to newer treatments or alternative therapies.

27. Reduces political interference — Shrinking the NHS means less top-down policy meddling.

28. Incentivizes healthy living — Insurance-linked health programs reward good habits.

29. Community health hubs — Small private/local clinics reduce the need for massive hospitals.

30. Resilient system — Multiple providers mean fewer system-wide collapses when crises hit.


Ideas for Local Health Bodies (e.g., Integrated Care Boards, ICBs)


Accredit private screening companies (Medichecks, Thriva) to offer local low-cost health MOTs.

Fund local digital GP services with small grants to help them scale in underserved areas.

Create hybrid public-private clinics — NHS doctors + private diagnostics under one roof.

Offer vouchers for residents to get private blood tests or mental health consultations.

Pilot health subscription models — Let locals pay a small fee for regular basic checkups.

Hold open tendering for specific services (e.g., minor injury clinics, eye tests) to drive down costs.

Create local health app directories — Approve and recommend vetted private health apps.

Support mobile health units run by private firms for rural or underserved zones.

Subsidize preventive care (e.g., nutrition counseling, blood pressure checks) via private partners.

Reward local GPs who partner with private screening labs to proactively manage at-risk patients.


chatgpt, my prompts


---


Would you also like me to sketch out a visual diagram showing how the new mixed healthcare ecosystem could work?

It might make the idea even sharper if you're planning a presentation or paper!



Social Workers, Too Trusting of Legals?

 Helping Social Workers Identify Psychopathic Traits in Legal Professionals


In the sensitive world of family law, vulnerable children and women depend on a fair, protective system. 

Yet sometimes, the very people entrusted with upholding justice — lawyers, guardians, even judges — may exhibit traits that actively harm rather than help.

Understanding how psychopathic behaviors can surface among legal professionals is crucial for social workers. Early identification can help protect families from further systemic abuse.

Why This Matters

Psychopathy is not just about criminal violence.

According to expert Dr. Robert Hare (author of Without Conscience, 1999), psychopathy is marked by superficial charm, manipulativeness, lack of empathy, deceitfulness, and a profound absence of guilt or remorse.

When these traits appear in legal professionals, it can dangerously skew outcomes:

Children's disclosures may be minimized or ignored.

Protective parents (often mothers) may be labeled as "alienators."

Court outcomes may favor abusers due to manipulation of the system.

Key Psychopathic Traits Social Workers Should Watch For

Superficial charm: A polished, charismatic manner that masks shallow intentions.

Manipulativeness: Twisting facts, gaslighting clients, bending narratives for self-interest.

Pathological lying: Lying comfortably in court documents or submissions without remorse.

Lack of empathy: Indifference toward child safety, victim trauma, or suffering.

Blame externalization: Always blaming victims or others, never accepting responsibility.

Grandiosity: Acting superior to ethical rules, displaying arrogance toward colleagues or the court.


Red Flags in Practice


Dismissing serious abuse evidence without credible reasons.

Vilifying protective parents as "hysterical" or "obsessive."

Aggressively threatening professionals who raise concerns.

Charm-offensive tactics targeting judges or senior staff while undermining others.

Practical Steps for Social Workers

Document everything: Keep clear, factual records of concerning behaviors.

Trust patterns, not excuses: Recognize repeated deception or cruelty.

Raise internal concerns: Follow safeguarding protocols if you suspect misconduct.

Seek peer support: Share experiences confidentially with trusted colleagues.

Push for trauma-informed training: Advocate for better understanding of coercive and manipulative behaviors in legal settings.


Recommended Reading and References


Hare, R. D. (1999). Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us. Guilford Press.


Stout, M. (2005). The Sociopath Next Door. Broadway Books.


Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work. Harper Business.


Hearn, J. (2020). Family Court Crisis: The Fight to Protect Children from Institutional Betrayal.


Ministry of Justice (2020). Assessing Risk of Harm to Children and Parents in Private Law Children Cases ("Harm Panel Report").


Judicial College (UK) resources on trauma-informed judicial practice


Conclusion


Family courts are complex, emotionally charged spaces.

Social workers are frontline defenders of vulnerable families.

By learning to recognize psychopathic traits — and their subtle infiltration into the legal system — social workers can strengthen their role as protectors of truth, safety, and dignity.


Justice must not just be done — it must be seen to be done. 


Prompts by liz lucy robillard, chatgpt



Thursday, April 24, 2025

Help for online stalking

 

Tips for self-care when suffering online stalking/hacking

1. Never let them know you are scared; do not publicly admit fear.

2. Keep a diary in your phone’s notes app detailing what happened. Ensure the notes are password protected.

3. Keep screenshots of every weird error message/technical issue (sabotage is their game, emotional terror their aim). The law will eventually catch up. Hold onto your evidence. It will help convict them.

4. Get tech secure:
- Use a VPN (Proton VPN is very easy and good)
- Antivirus
- Malwarebytes – run them daily.
- Know that your stalker is very likely to see all your posts wherever they are.
- Be very cautious of the Nextdoor app—only use it for local services, post nothing personal.
- Educate the perps and the public with posts about law, happiness, and psychology. Keep it grounded.

5. Ensure you have at least one person to confide in in real life.

6. Use the phone to talk to support services.

7. Assume you have no friends online. People online like to see dramas. Avoid drama at all costs. Abusers love it if you react or show vulnerability.

8. If you must ask for advice publicly, use a secure, anonymised private email address, and try Reddit for useful forums. Lots of trolls though. There are a lot of criminals online who love to hurt people. Be mindful but not paranoid.

9. Clear your caches. Clear your cookies. Clear your history. Change your password often—every few days or so should help. Check your logins on LinkedIn, Facebook, Outlook, etc. Stalkers and hackers leave a trail of their logins to your account. Log that in your notes and screenshot it all.
- Check 'permissions' in Google. Remove unnecessary ones.
- Never act on anything at all when scared.
- Deep breaths, take a break from the machine.
- Reclaim your space by engaging your senses: walk, sing, eat, dance, enjoy nature.
- Remember the three C's: Cool, Calm, Collected

10. Buy a treadmill! Force yourself to walk 3× a day. You may not feel up to walking outside much yet. An electric treadmill is affordable and a very healthy option.

11. Empower yourself. Sign up for psychology courses:
- Free at Alison
- Low-cost, accredited ones at Udemy

12. Get health aware. Share health-related items and learn as much as you can about your own health. Channel your emotions into positive actions.

Helpful organisations:
- Suzy Lamplugh Trust – Stalking support & advocacy
- Paladin – National Stalking Advocacy Service
- Women’s Aid – Help for women facing abuse
- Cyber Civil Rights Initiative – Online abuse & image-based abuse support
- Tech Safety – NNEDV – Digital safety tools for abuse survivors
- Victim Support (UK) – Help for anyone affected by crime

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

What causes genetic mutations, I asked

 Chatgpt:


Great—here are 16 susceptibility factors specifically relevant to neurodevelopmental conditions (like autism, ADHD, intellectual disability, etc.) through genetic mutation or gene expression disruption:

  1. Advanced paternal age – increases de novo mutations in sperm, linked to autism and schizophrenia.

  2. Advanced maternal age – associated with chromosomal abnormalities and some epigenetic risks.

  3. Prenatal infections – especially rubella, CMV, or flu in the first trimester can alter brain development.

  4. Maternal immune activation (MIA) – strong maternal immune response during pregnancy can disrupt fetal brain development.

  5. Fever during pregnancy – linked to increased autism risk, possibly via inflammatory pathways.

  6. Nutrient deficiencies – especially folate, choline, and vitamin D are critical for neural tube and brain development.

  7. Toxic metal exposure – prenatal or early-life exposure to mercury, lead, or arsenic can disrupt neurogenesis and synaptic wiring.

  8. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals – e.g., BPA, phthalates, and PCBs interfere with hormone-regulated gene expression during fetal brain development.

  9. Air pollution (especially fine particles and PAHs) – associated with increased autism and cognitive impairment risk.

  10. Pesticides (organophosphates, glyphosate, DDT residues) – shown to interfere with neural signaling and gene transcription in animal and human studies.

  11. Oxidative stress in utero – damages fetal DNA and is linked to altered neuronal development.

  12. Maternal obesity or diabetes – associated with increased oxidative stress and inflammation, affecting fetal brain epigenetics.

  13. Alcohol exposure (even moderate) – can alter gene expression in fetal neural stem cells.

  14. Psychological stress during pregnancy – chronic maternal stress elevates cortisol and inflammatory markers, which may influence gene expression and fetal brain circuitry.

  15. Perinatal hypoxia or birth trauma – can lead to epigenetic dysregulation and increased susceptibility to neurodevelopmental conditions.

  16. Microbiome imbalance in mother or infant – emerging evidence suggests the gut-brain axis and maternal microbiome influence early brain development via immune and metabolic gene signaling.

Would you like a visual summary or chart for these? Or narrowed down to those most likely to trigger de novo mutations versus epigenetic shifts?


Free stuff for non verbal disabled, 2025





Free stuff for Non Verbal Disabled, 2025











St.Georges Day

 

A Bit of What England Means to Me

Freedoms my dad fought for, as a very honourable Canadian risking his life to protect innocents and freedom, for one thing. 

My mum, with all her faults, entertained injured (burns units) troops with ENSA during the war. Both probably suffered undiagnosed PTSD, as would’ve a hell of a lot of England, after all the pain of bombings and scarce provisions, separations of families, and so many deaths of the way too young.

On lighter notes: London, Kensington and Chelsea, Brighton all mean a lot, and are great places that are examples of success and cohesion. Grub. Beans on toast. Fish ’n’ chips. Egg and chips. Scones and crumpets. 

Bird, plane and train watchers (though not exclusive to England, of course). Football (Chelsea!). 

Our humour — current fav: Tiny Tim’s Adventures (on Facebook). Our rich history of theatre and art, film and poetry. The Alberts: Bridge, Memorial, Hall. Kew Gardens and Richmond Park. The west: Cotswold beauty. Vintage cars. Architecture (though stuff your Brutalism). Pubs. Greggs. Kindness. Charity.

A lot. Happy St.Georges Day!



Monday, April 21, 2025

Evidence Against Trans?

 

chatgpt & liz lucy robillard, April 21st, 2025


It's natural to want to protect women from harm, especially from serious threats like rape. Some argue that to prevent even one assault, trans women (biological males) should be excluded from female-only spaces like toilets and prisons. 


While this comes from a place of caution, it doesn’t hold up under evidence or ethical scrutiny.


*Studies consistently show that inclusive policies do not increase assault rates in restrooms or changing rooms*


Trans women using female spaces *does not* correlate with higher risks of violence against cisgender women according to studies. 


The idea that cis men might pretend to be trans to access women’s areas is *extremely rare* and laws already exist to punish such behavior. 


Are those laws effective enough?


On the other hand, trans women face high rates of violence when forced into male-designated spaces, especially in prisons or public areas. 


Denying them access often puts them in real danger. Thus, blanket exclusions risk causing more harm than they prevent.


Ethically, using a “one harm justifies exclusion” approach leads to dangerous generalizations. By that logic, we’d have to ban many things that statistically cause harm — like cars, parks, or men altogether — which is neither practical nor just. Policies based on outliers often punish the innocent majority.


A more balanced and humane solution is to protect all vulnerable groups. In prisons, this means assessing individuals case-by-case, considering safety risks rather than just identity. In public facilities, privacy features like stalls and gender-neutral options can increase comfort without targeting anyone.


Should we ban men from parks as assaults happen there often? Dig and you will find plenty more examples. 


Protecting women from violence is absolutely essential — but policies should be built on facts and fairness, not fear of identity. The goal should be to *address behaviors*, not to exclude whole groups based on who they are.



---


References:


https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/transgender-toilet-access/


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5178031/


https://www.vox.com/identities/2016/5/15/11660304/bathroom-laws-sexual-assault


https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/03/02/us-trans-women-face-extreme-violence-men-prisons


Dear Family Court Judge

 To the Judge in Family Courts: A Brief Note


Edited by chatgpt 


Keywords: collusion, misfeasance, perjury, ad hominem, article 6, Mediation

Collusion between social workers and legal teams is not only unjust and far from probity—it undermines the foundational principles of the justice system. When such coordination leads to misleading or false statements being presented in court, it effectively constitutes perjury (as defined under the Perjury Act 1911, Section 1).

Allowing parties freedom to present their case in their own way, could help. Solicitors creating statements for their clients as verbatim when they are not, ought to be reviewed. 

When falsehoods are knowingly permitted or unchallenged by the court, and decisions are made on that basis, it amounts to misfeasance in public office—a recognized tort under common law. This is a serious breach of duty that carries legal consequences.

Rubber-stamping such conduct compromises the integrity of the court and violates the principle of judicial impartiality, which is protected under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights—the right to a fair trial.

Ad hominem attacks by professionals, often used to dismiss legitimate concerns without evidence, may seem efficient in a time-pressured environment. However, they do not meet the standard of procedural fairness required in family law proceedings, particularly when decisions affect the welfare and fundamental rights of children and parents.

Eventually, the truth may come to light—perhaps through appeals, independent reviews, or broader exposure of systemic issues. When it does, those who allowed or enabled injustice, even passively, may be seen as complicit.

 That includes those in positions of judicial authority who failed to act as safeguards against misconduct.

The value of mediation is discussed elsewhere, but to insist on it for all parties as an alternative to legal action would prevent such heartache and cruelty to vulnerable people.


In law and in conscience, accountability matters.

Elizabeth Lucy Robillard & chatgpt,

April 21st, 2025 


Thursday, April 17, 2025

Ai and law change?

 Title: Integrating AI Legal Language Models into Criminal and Civil Justice Systems: A Proposal for Evidence-Based Reform

Abstract: 


This paper proposes a comprehensive reform of criminal and civil justice systems by integrating Artificial Intelligence Legal Language Models (AI LLMs).


 These models, trained on extensive databases of legal cases, statutory law, psychological and criminological research, are designed to enhance judicial consistency, reduce systemic bias, and increase access to justice.


 This paper outlines the potential roles of AI LLMs in legal systems, examines ethical and practical safeguards, and provides examples of real-world applications and pilot programs.

---

1. Introduction

Justice systems worldwide face challenges including case backlogs, systemic bias, inaccessible legal services, and inconsistent rulings.


 The advancement of AI, particularly Legal Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, opens pathways to reform. When carefully integrated, these systems can support fairer, faster, and more psychologically informed legal outcomes.

---

2. Literature Review and Theoretical Framework

2.1 Legal AI Technologies Research into AI applications in law has rapidly expanded. Tools like ROSS Intelligence and CaseText have demonstrated how AI can support legal research and analysis (Surden, 2014). The National Center for State Courts has piloted AI-driven triage systems for civil legal aid (NCSC, 2022).

2.2 Psychology and Criminology Integration AI models trained on peer-reviewed psychological data can better assess risk and recommend rehabilitative strategies. Studies highlight the flaws in traditional risk assessments which often perpetuate racial and socioeconomic biases (Angwin et al., 2016).

2.3 Ethical and Legal Considerations Critics warn about the "black box" nature of AI models and potential data biases (Pasquale, 2015). Transparency and human oversight remain vital. The European Commission’s guidelines on trustworthy AI provide a robust framework for ethical integration (European Commission, 2020).

---

3. Proposed Reforms

3.1 AI Judicial Assistants

AI tools provide advisory opinions referencing precedent, statutes, and behavioral science.

Used by judges and legal counsel for pre-hearing research and during deliberations.

3.2 AI-Guided Sentencing and Rehabilitation

Models suggest sentencing alternatives based on criminological evidence.

Reduce reliance on flawed tools like COMPAS (ProPublica: https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing)

3.3 Online Civil Resolution Platforms

AI mediators for small claims, family law, housing disputes.

Examples include British Columbia's Civil Resolution Tribunal (https://civilresolutionbc.ca/).

3.4 Systemic Disparity Analysis

AI audits legal data to find patterns of injustice.

Recommends policy reforms and flags jurisdictions with anomalies.

3.5 Oversight Boards and Transparency

Multi-disciplinary panels review AI decisions.

Public-facing transparency tools to explain AI logic.

---

4. Case Studies and Pilot Projects

Estonia’s AI Judge Project: Uses AI for small contract disputes (BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50081328)

ODR in the Netherlands and Canada: Demonstrates AI-assisted resolution with strong user satisfaction.

---

5. Discussion

The integration of AI in legal contexts must balance innovation with accountability. Transparent design, inclusive datasets, and constant auditing are non-negotiable. Involving marginalized communities in development ensures systems serve all equitably.

---

6. Conclusion

AI Legal Language Models present a transformative opportunity for legal systems. With careful, ethical integration and robust oversight, these tools can dramatically improve justice delivery, reduce human error and bias, and empower citizens.

---

References

Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine Bias. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

European Commission. (2020). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai

Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.

Surden, H. (2014). Machine Learning and Law. Washington Law Review, 89(1), 87-115.

National Center for State Courts. (2022). AI Triage Pilot Report. https://www.ncsc.org/

---

Appendices

Appendix A: Sample AI Judicial Assistant Interface

Appendix B: Model Oversight Board Structure

Appendix C: List of Open Legal AI Datasets

Chatgpt April 15th 2025 prompt by me

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

Law Change and Ai 2025

 

How AI Could Revolutionize Criminal and Civil Justice Systems


Prompted by me, written by chatgpt, April 2025


Justice systems around the world are struggling. Courts are overloaded, rulings can be inconsistent, and bias—racial, socioeconomic, and beyond—still plays a disturbing role. But what if advanced artificial intelligence could help?


That’s not science fiction anymore. Legal Language Models (LLMs)—AI systems trained on vast libraries of legal cases, psychological research, and criminology studies—are already starting to reshape how justice is served. Here's how they could become powerful tools for fairness, efficiency, and access in criminal and civil courts.


1. Smarter, Fairer Legal Advice in the Courtroom


Imagine a judge or lawyer having a digital assistant that can instantly pull up the most relevant case law, psychological research, or data about social context—without human error or bias. AI tools could act as legal co-pilots, offering clear recommendations while always leaving the final say to humans.


2. Rethinking Sentencing with Psychology and Data


Current risk assessment tools used in criminal justice, like COMPAS, have come under fire for racial bias. But an AI model trained on rigorous, peer-reviewed psychology and criminology research could recommend fairer, evidence-based sentences focused on rehabilitation, not just punishment.


For example, someone with mental health issues might get support instead of prison time, reducing recidivism and human suffering.


3. Making Civil Justice Accessible for Everyone


In places like British Columbia and the Netherlands, online AI-driven systems are already helping people resolve civil disputes—from landlord issues to small claims—without a lawyer. These platforms are often free or low-cost, and designed to be user-friendly even for people with disabilities or language barriers.


Check out BC’s Civil Resolution Tribunal here: https://civilresolutionbc.ca/


4. Using AI to Detect Systemic Injustice


What if an AI could scan a country’s legal system and find out where people of color are sentenced more harshly, or where poor neighborhoods are more likely to be evicted?


With the right data and ethical oversight, AI could reveal patterns of injustice and help guide policy reform.


5. Keeping AI Accountable


Of course, we can’t hand over justice to a machine. These systems must be transparent and supervised by diverse teams of legal experts, technologists, ethicists, and everyday citizens. AI should serve people—not replace them.


The European Commission’s Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI is a great framework for how to do this right.


The Bottom Line


AI isn’t a magic solution. But used wisely, it can become a tool for a more humane, consistent, and accessible justice system.

 From fairer sentencing to faster civil resolutions, AI legal models have the potential to transform how we deliver justice

—if we’re brave and ethical enough to try.


Want to learn more?

Check out ProPublica’s deep dive on risk assessment bias:

 https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

Read about Estonia’s AI judge experiment: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50081328