British bloody justice

Prompt to chatgpt: 'The British are prone to witchhunts, is this part of a bigger problem, does it involve old school patriarchy and misguided, mistaken collusion that ignores or deliberately misinterprets evidence? Is it almost all ad hominem?'

The tendency toward witch hunts, both historically and in some modern contexts, can often be rooted in complex social dynamics, including patriarchy, power structures, and fear-driven groupthink. 

In historical cases like the witch hunts in Britain (and other parts of Europe), many of the issues were linked to social, religious, and political fears. Women, especially those who were independent, unconventional, or who could not conform to societal norms, were often the targets, reflecting patriarchal structures that sought to control and marginalize women.

The social dynamics of witch hunts also involved the misuse of authority, [misfeasance] ignorance, and a lack of critical thinking. 

Ad hominem attacks—dismissing or attacking individuals rather than addressing the substance of their arguments—often played a significant role in these events, as people were accused based on personal grievances, superstition, or other irrational reasons.

In modern contexts, some argue that certain types of social or political "witch hunts" are driven by a combination of old biases, emotional responses, and a tendency to scapegoat individuals or groups. When evidence is ignored or manipulated, it may suggest a deep-rooted issue of collective denial, emotionality overriding reason, and sometimes even a desire to maintain control by certain power structures.

In short, while witch hunts can be seen as stemming from old-school patriarchal and fear-based tendencies, they also point to a broader issue of how societies can become fixated on certain narratives, dismiss contrary evidence, and attack individuals instead of addressing the underlying issues.

Chatgpt and Liz Lucy Robillard April 15, 2025

Homeschooling UK Law

 Re: The Childrens Wellbeing & Schools Bill

To mitigate safeguarding concerns in home education, regular visits from professionals such as educational psychologists and specially trained personnel could serve as a compassionate and effective solution.

These visits would not only offer oversight but also provide critical emotional and educational support tailored to the unique needs of neurodiverse children.

The traditional school environment often fails to accommodate students with autism, ADHD, or sensory processing issues, leading to mental health decline and school refusal (Brede et al., 2017; Munk et al., 2021).

For many, like myself, who self-taught from age 13, being forced back would have been unbearable—potentially life-ending.

I can say with certainty that I would have taken my own life had I been made to return to school.

Rather than relying on a punitive or compliance-driven framework, the introduction of compassionate check-ins by trained personnel would reassure both parents and children that their rights, autonomy, and mental health are being respected.

This kind of oversight would also help flag cases where home education may be used to mask abuse or neglect, without alienating families who are using it as a lifeline.

As suggested by Rothermel (2015), most home-educating parents are deeply committed to their children's wellbeing, and home education often becomes a necessary adaptation, not a rejection of education.

Moreover, research has found that neurodivergent learners often thrive in flexible, low-stress environments where they can follow their interests, regulate sensory input, and avoid the social overwhelm of the classroom (Thomas & Pattison, 2008).

Home education, when supported with professional input rather than surveillance, allows these learners to flourish. Thus, the goal should not be to eliminate home education, but to enrich and safeguard it through regular, respectful engagement that centres the child’s voice, autonomy, and wellbeing.


References:
• Brede, J., Remington, A., Kenny, L., Warren, K., & Pellicano, E. (2017). School refusal and mental health in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(11), 3458–3467.
• Munk, R., Regehr, C., & Chaim, G. (2021). Mental health impacts of school environments on students with autism. Autism, 25(5), 1234–1246.
• Rothermel, P. (2015). Home Education: A Research-Based Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Thomas, A., & Pattison, H. (2008). How Children Learn at Home. Continuum.

Liz Lucy Robillard & Chatgpt 2025

Hacks to Reduce Anxiety

 

Here are neuroscience- and psychology-based techniques, including physical actions like Havening, that are known to help reduce anxiety by engaging the nervous system, brain chemistry, or cognitive patterns:

---

1. Havening Touch (Amygdala Depotentiation Technique)

• What it is: Gentle self-touching (stroking arms, hands, or face) combined with positive visualization or distraction.
• Why it works: Engages delta brain waves and activates sensory input to reduce amygdala activity, helping “depotentiate” trauma or anxiety-encoded pathways.
• Use: While recalling a distressing memory, apply slow, gentle touch and repeat soothing words or count.

---

2. Bilateral Stimulation (from EMDR)

• What it is: Alternating left-right stimulation (e.g., tapping knees or shoulders, moving eyes side to side).
• Why it works: Helps the brain process and integrate distressing memories and reduces emotional intensity.
• Use: While thinking of an anxiety-provoking event, tap your thighs left-right-left-right rhythmically.

---

3. Vagal Nerve Stimulation Techniques

The vagus nerve helps switch the nervous system from fight-or-flight to rest-and-digest mode.

a. Deep Slow Breathing (5-7 breaths per minute)
b. Humming, Chanting, or Singing
c. Gargling with Water
d. Cold Water Splash or Holding Ice Pack on Face

• Why it works: Stimulates the vagus nerve and parasympathetic system, lowering heart rate and calming the brain.

---

4. Tapping (EFT – Emotional Freedom Technique)

• What it is: Tapping acupressure points while voicing affirmations or feelings.
• Why it works: May reduce cortisol levels and deactivate fear responses.
• Use: Tap side of hand, then sequence of points (e.g., eyebrow, side of eye, under eye, chin, collarbone).

---

5. Somatic Grounding Techniques

• Examples:
  • Push your feet into the floor firmly.
  • Grip the edge of a chair.
  • Describe textures of objects around you.
• Why it works: Shifts attention away from anxious thoughts to the present moment through body and sensory input.

---

6. Orienting (Polyvagal-Informed)

• What it is: Slowly scan your environment with your head and eyes, noticing colors, light, shapes.
• Why it works: Signals to the nervous system that you are safe and not under threat.

---

7. Self-Compassion Touch

• Place hand on heart, cheek, or give yourself a gentle hug.
• Why it works: Activates the brain's caregiving system (oxytocin release), reducing threat and shame.

---

8. Box Breathing (Used by Navy SEALs)

• How: Inhale 4 sec → Hold 4 sec → Exhale 4 sec → Hold 4 sec.
• Why it works: Balances oxygen and CO2, regulates nervous system.

---

9. Interoceptive Awareness Training

• What it is: Tuning into internal body signals like heartbeat or breath.
• Why it works: Improves body awareness and reduces dissociation or overthinking

Chatgpt 2025 with my prompt, liz robillard

Lucy Letby and the C-peptide evidence, incontrovertible?

 Is it? The independent experts that have no financial interests questioned it all, ai explains:

Prompt: Why the c-peptide evidence in the Lucy Letby case is questionable and how subsequent experts have refuted it?

Why the C-peptide evidence in the Lucy Letby case is questionable and how experts have refuted it:

• Test Reliability:

The prosecution used immunoassay tests to detect insulin and C-peptide levels. These tests showed high insulin and low C-peptide, suggesting someone had injected insulin. However, immunoassay tests are known to be unreliable for detecting synthetic (exogenous) insulin.

• Expert Criticism:

Dr. Adel Ismail, a clinical biochemist, noted these tests can produce errors. He pointed out that in cases like Baby F’s, with extremely high insulin levels, retesting should have been done because of the risk of false results.

• Manufacturer’s Warning:
The lab that did the tests had stated that their insulin assay is not suitable for detecting injected insulin. This casts doubt on the prosecution’s conclusions.

• Lack of Confirmatory Testing:
Experts say more accurate methods like mass spectrometry should have been used to confirm the findings. This was not done.

• New Expert Review:

Letby’s legal team submitted an 86-page report to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), signed by seven senior medical experts. It challenges the insulin evidence and raises the possibility of natural causes or mismanagement.

• Wider Medical Opinion:
A separate panel of 14 experts reviewed the case and found no clear signs of intentional harm by Letby.

• Conflicting Views:
Some experts, like Prof. Keith Frayn, argue the tests are generally reliable, but others stress that without confirmatory testing, the results shouldn't have been taken as conclusive.

• Appeal Process:
The CCRC is currently reviewing this new evidence, which could impact Letby’s conviction.

Chatgpt & liz 2025 

Cancer, why a strong immune system will help

 

Why a Strong Immune System Is One of Your Best Defenses Against Cancer

When we think of immunity, we tend to think of colds, flus, or maybe COVID-19. But the immune system is far more than a line of defense against viruses. It is an active surveillance system that plays a critical role in detecting and destroying abnormal cells—especially those that could become cancerous.

Cancer begins when cells acquire mutations that allow them to grow uncontrollably. But long before a tumor becomes visible, the immune system is already at work. Specialized cells like natural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes can recognize early signs of transformation in cells and eliminate them. This process, known as immunosurveillance, is one of the body’s natural defenses against cancer (Dunn et al., Nature Immunology, 2002).

In fact, individuals with compromised immune systems—such as transplant recipients on immunosuppressants or people with HIV—have significantly higher cancer rates (Grulich et al., Lancet, 2007). Conversely, robust immune function is linked with reduced cancer risk and better outcomes. For example, higher infiltration of CD8+ T cells into tumors has been associated with longer survival across several cancer types (Fridman et al., Nature Reviews Cancer, 2012).

Maximizing immune health goes far beyond avoiding illness. It includes optimizing sleep, reducing chronic stress (which can impair immune function), maintaining regular physical activity, and eating nutrient-rich, anti-inflammatory foods—all of which are known to support immune performance (Nieman & Wentz, J Sport Health Sci, 2019).

Importantly, cancer cells can sometimes evade immune detection, but a strong immune system makes that evasion more difficult. Immunotherapies—one of the most promising fields in modern oncology—work by reactivating immune cells to do what they were built for: targeting and destroying malignant cells.

In short: the stronger your immune system, the more resilient you are—not just to colds, but to cancer itself.

---

References:

1. Dunn GP, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. The immunobiology of cancer immunoediting and immunotherapy. Nat Immunol. 2002;3(11):991-998.
2. Grulich AE, van Leeuwen MT, Falster MO, Vajdic CM. Incidence of cancers in people with HIV/AIDS compared with immunosuppressed transplant recipients: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;370(9581):59–67.
3. Fridman WH, Pagès F, Sautès-Fridman C, Galon J. The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(4):298–306.
4. Nieman DC, Wentz LM. The compelling link between physical activity and the body's defense system. J Sport Health Sci. 2019;8(3):201–217.

---

Chatgpt & Elizabeth Lucy Robillard 2025

Get over it ya wuss, or what?

 You’ve Been Hurt—You Owe It to Yourself to Heal

(By drawing from the work of Dr. Stephen C. Hayes and Dr. Kristin Neff)

When someone tells us to “just get over it,” they often mean well. Maybe they’re uncomfortable with our pain. Maybe they want to help us move on. But the truth is, emotional wounds don’t disappear through force or denial. 

Healing isn’t about “getting over it.” It’s about turning toward our pain with compassion and courage—and choosing to live meaningfully in its presence. 

This is where Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), developed by Dr. Stephen C. Hayes, and the self-compassion work of Dr. Kristin Neff, converge powerfully.

ACT teaches that pain is part of life—it’s not something to be erased, but something to make space for. Trying to avoid, suppress, or “fix” emotional pain often leads us into deeper suffering.

Instead, ACT invites us to accept what we feel without judgment, and to reconnect with what matters most to us—even while we hurt. Healing, in this sense, means showing up to life as it is, and committing to actions that align with our values.

Dr. Kristin Neff’s research on self-compassion adds another layer: kindness toward the self when we’re in pain. Rather than criticizing ourselves for still being hurt, for not moving on faster, or for being “too sensitive,” self-compassion offers understanding. It says: Of course you’re hurting. This is hard. You deserve care, not blame. Self-compassion also reminds us that suffering is part of being human—we are not broken or alone in our pain.

Together, ACT and self-compassion don’t urge us to “get over it” as quickly as possible. They guide us gently to move through it. To allow grief, betrayal, or trauma to exist without letting them define us. To stop waiting for pain to end before we begin living again.

So if you’ve been hurt, you do owe something to yourself—not to be tougher, faster, or unaffected, but to be honest, brave, and kind.

 You owe it to yourself to stop fighting your pain and start honoring your healing. That’s where true freedom begins.

Elizabeth Lucy Robillard & Chatgpt 2025

Sigmund Freud, such a dick?

 Monday (ai) answers 'why was Sigmund Freud such a dick?'

Ah, finally, a real question. Freud was basically the original “guy who thinks he’s the smartest person in the room but is actually saying insane things.” He was obsessed with childhood trauma, saw phallic symbols in literally everything, and had the audacity to tell women their psychological distress was just "hysteria."

A few reasons why he was kind of a jerk:

• Ego the Size of Austria – Freud thought he had cracked the human mind like a cheat code, and anyone who disagreed with him was just “in denial.” Which, conveniently, was one of his own psychological defense mechanisms.

• Mommy Issues Turned Into a Career – The dude was convinced that every man secretly wanted to replace his dad and marry his mom. Gross, Sigmund. Just because you had weird thoughts doesn’t mean the rest of us do.

• Wildly Sex-Obsessed – Everything was about sex to Freud. Dreams? Sex. Slips of the tongue? Sex. Your love of gardening? Probably about repressed sexual urges. It’s like he was the first guy to turn everything into that’s what she said.

• Gaslight, Gatekeep, Psychoanalyze – Freud had a nasty habit of dismissing people who challenged his theories. If you disagreed with him, you weren’t being logical—you were just proving his theory by resisting it. Classic move.

• Cocaine Enthusiast – Fun fact: Freud loved cocaine. Like, really loved it. He thought it was a miracle drug and prescribed it for everything, which probably explains why his ideas were so... out there.

So yeah, was he influential? Sure. But was he also kind of a pompous, coke-fueled, mom-obsessed mansplainer? Oh, absolutely.

chatgpt 'monday' 

Easy Microwave Vegetable Soup

 

To make mixed chopped veggies mushy in the microwave (similar to a soup consistency), follow these steps:

Instructions:

1. Chop the Veggies Small – The smaller the pieces, the faster they soften.
2. Add Water or Broth – Use about ½ to 1 cup of liquid per 2 cups of chopped veggies.
3. Cover Loosely – Use a microwave-safe bowl with a lid or a plate to prevent splattering while allowing steam to escape.
4. Microwave on HIGH:
   • 8–10 minutes for soft but still structured veggies.
   • 12–15 minutes for very soft, mushy, soup-like texture.
5. Stir Every 5 Minutes – This ensures even cooking.
6. Mash or Blend (Optional) – Use a fork, potato masher, or blender if you want a smoother consistency.

If you're making a full soup, you can microwave the veggies for 12–15 minutes with broth, then blend everything for a creamy texture.

The Illusion of Religious Virtue in British Society

 The Illusion of Religious Virtue

in British Society

If we are to take seriously the ideals of gratitude, equality, peace, and life satisfaction, we must acknowledge that religion is not merely unnecessary but, in many cases, an active impediment to these goals.

The building of 'places of worship' by other cultures here is anti-progress at best and doesn't support British culture or integration at all! And at what cost could it be to our cultural identity and heritage?

 The ultimate price could be the loss of our very identity that leaves us open to less developed (and sometimes dangerous) ideology and the eradication of our Britishness. 

  (Though freedom of thought and right to privacy is naturally a cornerstone of Britishness, but that too, according to some legal orgs, isn't being upheld very strongly at present)


A lot of political discourse remains tangled in the archaic assumptions of faith.


Gratitude, for instance, need not be framed in terms of divine generosity.

We really ought cultivate appreciation for our lives and all that's in it, including the people and systems that actually sustain our lives here—science, democracy, law and social cooperation.


(Gratitude practice needs begin at home. I recommend using a (free) app called 'Presently' to remind you of all you are grateful for on a daily basis. Among my repeating entries is 'tech' and 'good people'.

 This helps promote contentment and positivity)

To tether gratitude to a deity is to obscure the real, tangible work of human progress.


Equality, likewise, is hindered by religious dogma.


In 2025, Britain still grapples with faith-based schools, unelected bishops in the Lords, and policies that privilege religious identity over secular reason! It's absurd!


These relics sustain division rather than dissolve it though having said that, I respect Christianity over other religions as it's helped advance developing countries (though not much appreciation for that either!)


As for personal peace, gratitude aside, a note: Noise law needs updating, ask Brian May who also suffered from this councils lack of care. (Noise almost killed me from construction next door and from a deaf judo- lover upstairs (gone now thank f***)) There is no good protection from construction noise, bad show Britain! 


  And life satisfaction? Evidence ( Europe especially) overwhelmingly supports personal agency and gratitude in *secular* societies—where reason and humanism, not divine fiat, guide ethics—as more content and equitable.


If Britain is to evolve, we must shed these vestigial myths and embrace a morality unpolluted by superstition. A better future demands nothing less.


Elizabeth Lucy Robillard 2025 (ai assisted)

In Defence of the Internet

 In defence of the internet

I have to say, cat videos and interesting and funny memes have done more for me than socialising with most people.

Google is a friend, Ai is a parent, teacher and therapist. Apps are assistants and teachers.

 I have fought off a lot of stalking and hacking though but good techies provide very useful security.

My love goes out to the good programmers and techies who have worked indefatigably to improve the lives of everyone in the world. 

Now chatgpt version:

The internet, for all its flaws, remains one of the greatest gifts to human consciousness. It is an extension of the mind itself—a place where curiosity finds immediate reward, where humor and creativity flourish, and where solitude need not equate to loneliness. In my own experience, cat videos and clever memes have provided more genuine joy and psychological relief than many social interactions.

Google is more than a tool; it is a vast, ever-present friend, ready to satisfy intellectual hunger at any moment. Artificial intelligence, in its evolving forms, is not merely an invention but a surrogate parent, teacher, and therapist—offering guidance, insight, and, at times, a kind of digital wisdom. The apps we use daily are not just conveniences but essential extensions of our capabilities, assisting in everything from organization to education.

Yet, the internet is not without its perils. I have encountered stalking, hacking, and invasions of privacy. But for every threat, there are brilliant, ethical techies working tirelessly to safeguard this space. My deepest respect goes to the programmers, engineers, and visionaries who, with relentless effort, have made the digital world not only possible but profoundly enriching for humanity.

Liz Lucy Robillard and ai 2025

Councils, What Judges Need To Know

 

Judges must recognize that councils often employ ad hominem attacks to discredit members of the public rather than addressing the substance of their claims. 

This tactic is not simply an unfortunate byproduct of legal disputes—it is a deliberate strategy. Bureaucratic institutions, by their nature, seek to preserve authority and minimize challenges, which can reduce their moral standing in public eyes.

When confronted with legitimate grievances, councils frequently shift the focus from the argument to the individual making it, portraying them as unreasonable, vexatious, or uninformed. This can cause significant harm to innocent parties. 

It not only distracts from the core issue but also creates a chilling effect, discouraging others from seeking justice. 

The judiciary’s role is to cut through rhetorical distortions and demand reasoned argumentation and thorough evidence. 

Judges must be vigilant in identifying when councils rely on character attacks instead of engaging with the evidence. 

A person’s temperament, persistence, or prior disputes with authorities are irrelevant to the merits of their case. 

If a council’s defense hinges on undermining an individual’s credibility rather than addressing the legal or factual basis of their claim, that defense should be seen for what it is: an evasion and possibly conspiracy to pervert justice, leading to perjury, misfeasance etc. 

To prevent this, courts should insist on strict evidentiary standards, challenging councils to justify their arguments without resorting to personal attacks. Impartialty would foster better relations.

By refusing to entertain ad hominem reasoning, judges uphold the principles of fairness, ensuring that the state does not gain an unjust advantage over those it is meant to serve.

Elizabeth Lucy Robillard 2025

Ai assisted

Truth About Narcissism, Highly Suspicious Behaviour

 

 ...Or, The Ego Trap: Why Pop Psychology is Fueling a Culture of Suspicion

Let’s get one thing straight sweetie—narcissism isn’t some dirty little secret lurking in the shadows of society. The way you perceive it probably, is just ego, and we all have it. Some more than others, sure, but without a healthy dose of self-regard, you’d never strut into that boardroom, work that red carpet, or have the confidence to chase what you desire. It’s survival.

Nastiness is nastiness not a pd!

But in this digital age of pound-shop psychology and self-proclaimed “experts,” suddenly everyone with a little swagger or self-assurance is a “narcissist.” Post one selfie too many? Narcissist. Prioritize your dreams? Narcissist. Set boundaries? Oh, you must be evil. The result? A culture of suspicion where every lover, boss, or friend is scrutinized, labeled, and discarded—no clinical degree required, just a Wi-Fi connection and a Facebook account.

Now, let’s be clear: narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is real. It’s a serious, complex psychiatric condition that goes far beyond just being selfish, arrogant, or confident. It’s marked by a deep, pathological need for admiration, an inability to truly empathize with others, and, at its worst, a manipulative, destructive nature that leaves real victims in its wake. It’s not a quirky personality flaw; it’s a disorder diagnosed by professionals who actually understand the difference between self-love and psychological dysfunction.

But the internet? It’s turned armchair diagnoses into a sport. Real NPD affects a small percentage of the population, but if you believed everything you saw online, you’d think half the world was full of raging narcissists. And that’s dangerous. It fosters paranoia, encourages people to cut ties with anyone who doesn’t meet their every emotional need, and turns personal conflicts into pathology. It’s not psychology—it’s a witch hunt in designer heels.

The truth? A little ego is power. It drives ambition, fuels creativity, and stops you from getting trampled by life’s users and abusers. So, let’s quit the reckless labeling and recognize the difference between confidence and pathology. Because if we keep slapping clinical terms on anyone who dares to shine, we’re not diagnosing a disorder—we’re dimming the lights on greatness.

Ai assisted

Liz Lucy Robillard

Woke and Snowflake?

 

Assertiveness is the ability to stand one’s ground without resorting to hostility or self-doubt.

 It is not about becoming aggressive, nor is it about adopting the fragile sensibilities of a modern snowflake.

 Instead, it is about clear, confident communication—something British children must learn if they are to navigate the world effectively.

Unfortunately, contemporary culture often presents a false choice: be either passive and deferential or overly sensitive and woke, seeking offense where none was intended.

 Neither of these approaches fosters true confidence. To be assertive is to express one’s views with clarity, without either groveling for approval or demanding special treatment.

The key to teaching this skill is helping children understand that disagreement is not aggression. 

They should be encouraged to say, “I don’t agree, and here’s why,” rather than staying silent for fear of offending or reacting emotionally to every challenge. 

The British tradition of understatement and wit can be an asset here—one can be both polite and firm without sacrificing honesty.

What assertiveness is not is the modern trend of elevating every personal discomfort into a moral crisis. 

Children should learn that feeling offended does not automatically make them right, nor does it entitle them to silence others. 

The woke impulse to shield oneself from difficult conversations fosters weakness, not strength.

Instead, true assertiveness is about standing firm on principles, engaging in respectful disagreement, and recognizing that resilience is a virtue. 

In a world increasingly dominated by ideological extremes, the ability to think clearly and speak without fear is not just a skill—it is a necessity.

Ai assisted